After one of the strongest El Niños ever recorded, Ethiopia has suffered erratic rains and severe drought in many regions, putting millions of people at risk of hunger and diseases. Abdi (pictured) brought what remains of his livestock here in search of water, about 30 kilometres from his home in an adjoining district, because there is no water there and his herd is dying. ‘I used to have 300 sheep, goats, and camels, now I have about 25 camels,’ he says. (Photo: Pablo Tosco / Oxfam)
Climate change hits poor communities first and worst
Loss of livelihoods and hunger
Currently, 800 million people go to bed hungry every night, but ironically, 80 per cent are smallholder farmers: fisherfolk, pastoralists and landless farmers who produce food. Wild weather and unpredictable seasons are changing what farmers can grow and affecting their livelihoods. The poorest are often the most vulnerable and least prepared to cope with the effects of climate change. Ethiopia is one of them. More than 80 per cent of the population depend on agriculture. Erratic rains and severe drought have been putting millions of people at risk of hunger and disease.
However, the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions from human activities is from burning fossil fuels for electricity generation, travelling by car, ship and plane, etc.; hence, poor communities around the world are the least responsible for emissions. According to Oxfam’s report, the poorest half of the world’s population is responsible for just 10 per cent of carbon emissions, despite being the most threatened by severe weather shocks linked to climate change. Climate change hits poor people first and worst. It's a climate crisis that deepens poverty and exacerbates injustice.
Who takes the heat?
In December 2019, Oxfam released a report titled ‘Forced from Home’ as world leaders gathered in Madrid for the UN Climate Summit. It revealed that over 20 million people a year – one person every two seconds – were internally displaced by extreme weather disasters between 2008 and 2018. While no one is immune, Oxfam’s analysis shows that people in poor countries, who bear least responsibility for global carbon pollution, are most at risk.
The report also shows that today, people are seven times more likely to be internally displaced by cyclones, floods and wildfires as they are by earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, and three times more likely than by conflict. This group of ‘climate refugees’ is mainly from developing countries such as Guatemala. A climate-fuelled El Niño period has brought the country nearly six years of drought. A recent Oxfam study estimates that nearly 80 per cent of the corn and bean harvest was lost in Guatemala in 2019, while almost 70 per cent of children in the worst hit areas in the country suffered from malnutrition.
People from the Small Island Developing States (SIDS), particularly those from the Caribbean and the Pacific, face the greatest risks. Seven of the 10 countries with the highest rates of displacement from extreme weather disasters over the past decade are classified as SIDS – a recognised grouping in UN climate and environmental negotiations.
|Country||Key cause of displacement||Percentage of population newly displaced by sudden-onset extreme weather events on average each year between 2008–18||Emissions per capita (global rank out of 193 Member States of the UN as of 2014)|
|4||Philippines||Tropical cyclones, floods||3.5%||170|
|5||Saint Maartens||Tropical cyclones||2.8%||(No data)|
|7||Fiji||Tropical cyclones, floods||1.5%||190|
|8||Sri Lanka||Floods, storms||1.4%||147|
In Hong Kong, extreme weather is making the poorest life harder!
Extreme weather exacerbated by climate change has had a major impact on sanitation workers and their working environment. In summer 2021, Oxfam Hong Kong (OHK) commissioned a research team to interview 200 frontline outdoor cleaners, 90 per cent said they had to work in the sun most of the time, while nearly 70 per cent needed to work in the heat all day long. Despite this, employers have yet to provide them with cooling equipment and have failed to comply with the Labour Department’s guidelines on working in hot weather.
Furthermore, according to OHK’s study on sanitation workers working conditions at refuse collection points (RCPs) in summer 2022, the average temperature at RCPs is 32°C, which is even higher than the record-breaking average temperature outdoors (30.3 °C). Moreover, poor ventilation, wet and stifling heat, infestation, stench and the lack of resting space are common problems found in old, newly-built and renovated RCPs. More than 65 per cent of sanitation workers said they always feel unwell when they work at RCPs, more than 75 per cent of interviewees said they could only find cooler areas outside to eat and rest, which has led members of the public to misunderstand and accuse them of being lazy, which also put them in the risk of being reported and lost their job.
Extreme weather aren’t just affecting the poorest when they work outdoors. Their homes have become so hot they’re like bamboo steamers – temperatures are sometimes even hotter than they are outdoors. OHK commissioned a research team to interview 200 people from low-income backgrounds who lived in subdivided flat across Hong Kong in September 2021.
The study found that temperatures inside these flats were hotter than outside – some even 5.8 degrees Celsius hotter. The hottest flat saw temperatures soar as high as 35.1 degrees Celsius. Nearly 70 per cent of respondents said that the intense heat affected their everyday lives, especially their physical health. They also found it difficult to work/study, and experienced more stress. Over a quarter of respondents also said that their flats would see some sort of damage during typhoons or rainstorms. Since some of their landlords were unwilling to pay for repairs, they were left to shoulder for the expenses on their own, which added to their financial burden.
Watch: Day vs Night: Climate Injustice in Hong Kong
Oxfam advocating for climate justice
In 1992, the world took its first steps towards addressing climate change by holding the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Rio de Janeiro, its first summit-level meeting. Then in 1995, an annual meeting, the Conference of Parties (or COP), was convened to assess the progress made in the fight against climate change.
Oxfam first proposed to fight climate change at the Bali Climate Change Conference in 2007. Since then, Oxfam has continued to look into issues like climate change and how it relates to poverty, as well as climate justice. In order to prevent the impacts of climate change from devastating poor countries and communities, ‘mitigation’ and ‘adaptation’ must be carried out hand in hand.
Reducing the threat of climate change for vulnerable countries
Even if the world stops emitting greenhouse gases right now, the cumulative effects of the pooled greenhouse gases would still warm the earth and bring about severe negative impacts.
Therefore, poor communities have an unparalleled need to adapt to climate change. Adaptation implies a transformation in farming methods and the means of income generation, and reducing the direct impact on livelihoods from an unpredictable climate:
Rich polluting countries must deliver the promised amount of funding to support emission reductions and adaptation in poor countries
In addition to more ambitious emissions cuts, rich polluting countries have promised to help poor countries and communities adapt and take the measures needed to help them remain in their communities and on their land. Regarding this, at the Copenhagen Climate Summit in 2009, developed countries agreed to mobilise US$100 billion per year in climate finance by 2020 to help poorer nations deliver mitigative and adaptive measures through technological development and capacity building to cope with the impacts of climate change.
However, Oxfam estimates that donors reported just under US$60 billion per year on average in 2017 and 2018 — the latest years for which figures are available. But the true value of support for climate action may be as little as US$19-22.5 billion per year once loan repayments, interest and other forms of over-reporting are stripped out. It remains a long way short of delivering the promised US$100 billion a year to help poor countries avoid future emissions and adapt. Further, only an estimated 25 per cent of total public climate finance was for adaptation and 66 per cent was for mitigation.
To ensure that poor communities affected by the climate crisis receive the necessary support, governments must:
- Climate adaptation: Scale up public climate finance and ensure at least 50 per cent of climate finance goes towards adaptation.
- New and improved NDCs: Submit NDCs by COP26 that reflect their fair share of global climate action required to stay within the Paris Agreement’s goal of keeping global warming below 1.5°C. Collectively, they need to amount to approximately halving global emissions in the next 9 years.
- Green and fair COVID-19 recovery: Ensure economic stimulus packages that boost the recovery from COVID-19 are both green and fair — targeting the emissions of the richest, highest emitters while benefiting lower income communities.
- Proceed carefully with net-zero commitments: Ensure that ‘net-zero’ commitments do not threaten the right to land and the right to food of communities in the global South; corporates must do the same.
The climate crisis and adaptation measures in poor countries
El Niños are getting stronger due to climate change. With one of the strongest El Niño ever recorded in 2016, irregular weather patterns in Ethiopia’s Somali region have made rainy season more erratic and unpredictable. Some villages have even seen no rainfall in over a year. Oxfam has been working with communities since 2011 to provide emergency water in the worst affected areas, to introduce disaster risk reduction measures and work with affected populations to develop their livelihoods and ensure food security. (Photo: Poon wai-nang / Oxfam)
Mako and her husband Mahamud are pastoralist farmers living in the Somali region of Ethiopia. In the past few years, they have been affected by severe drought. Oxfam is working to help pastoralist farmers like Mako and Mahamud to diversify their sources of income and grow crops that are more resistant to droughts. (Photo: Kieran Doherty / Oxfam)
On 14 to 15 March 2019, Cyclone Idai slammed into Mozambique, Malawi and Zimbabwe, devastating the lives of about 2.6 million people across the three countries and claiming the lives of over 1,000. Barely six weeks on, Cyclone Kenneth tore through northern Mozambique. Repeated cyclones in Mozambique have caused US$3.2 billion worth of loss and damage – equivalent to 22 per cent of the country’s GDP or approximately 50 per cent of its national budget. (Photo: Sergio Zimba / Oxfam)
After her house was severely damaged by Cyclone Kenneth, Fatuma said: ‘When the winds started, everyone was looking for a tree to hold on to so that you’re not blown away. When the rain hit your face, it was like being hit by a stone. I grabbed my kid’s bag that had a sweater and some clothes because I didn’t want them to be cold.’ (Photo: Oxfam)
Oxfam distributed hygiene items to people affected by Cyclone Idai with partner organisation AJOAGO, a Mozambican humanitarian organisation. As world leaders gathered in New York for the Climate Action Summit in September 2019, Jose Mucote, the Executive Director of AJOAGO, went all the way from Mozambique to bring the voice of the Mozambicans to the world. ‘Every day, we’re supporting people who are already living in extreme poverty and have coped with a higher number of crises over the past two decades. Each disaster is making people poorer by the day and more vulnerable to whatever may come next’, said Jose. (Photo: Micas Mondlane / Oxfam)
‘We spent almost eight days enduring starvation’, Mariana said. In the community of Naranjo in Guatemala, climate change is leaving people with nothing to eat. With no other option, Mariana’s husband and her 20-year-old son walked for 20 days towards the United States in search of work. They had to sell their land and take on debt to pay for the journey. When her husband sends money back, some of it is used to pay off the debt and the rest goes towards the family’s survival. (Photo: Valerie Caamaño / Oxfam)